Re: Glaucoma drop comparison?
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:39:45 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:44:12 -0700
)
Re: new to progressives - not happy
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:53:49 -0500
)
Re: I need comfortable eyewear
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:37:25 -0700
)
Re: 1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:29:09 -0500
)
Re: I need comfortable eyewear
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:19:30 GMT
)
Re: I need comfortable eyewear
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:11:20 -0500
)
Re: Glaucoma drop comparison?
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:05:20 GMT
)
Re: Second-opinion answers to Majority-opinion Questions
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:53:11 -0700
)
The second-opinion site
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:48:14 -0700
)
The second-opinion, and a choice
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:44:15 -0700
)
Re: Astigmatism changed?
(Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:47:04 -0500
)
Astigmatism changed?
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:48:58 -0700
)
Re: Glaucoma drop comparison?
(Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:49:20 -0700
)
Blind spot dimensions
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:35:36 -0700
)
Re: Second-opinion answers to Majority-opinion Questions
(Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:58:40 -0000
)
Color atlas of ophthalmology and eye diseases
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:46:57 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:36:43 -0700
)
Re: Glaucoma drop comparison?
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:32:33 -0700
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:52:09 -0700
)
Re: I need comfortable eyewear
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:47:57 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:46:08 -0000
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:14:57 -0700
)
I need comfortable eyewear
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:54:31 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:41:03 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:30:57 -0700
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:12:13 GMT
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:52:28 -0000
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:13:13 -0400
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:05:13 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:41:12 -0000
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:39:59 GMT
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:32:15 GMT
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:26:45 -0000
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:10:11 GMT
)
Re: Second-opinion answers to Majority-opinion Questions
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:04:43 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:03:19 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:42:14 -0700
)
Re: Second-opinion answers to Majority-opinion Questions
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:40:58 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:39:05 -0700
)
Re: Second-opinion answers to Majority-opinion Questions
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:36:15 -0700
)
The second-opinion answers to the
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:20:38 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:09:53 -0000
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:01:27 -0000
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:13:08 GMT
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:31:58 -0000
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:26:51 -0700
)
Re: Campimetry
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:54:49 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:34:28 -0000
)
Re: Campimetry
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:26:47 -0700
)
Re: Campimetry
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:58:41 -0700
)
Re: Campimetry
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:21:15 -0700
)
Re: Campimetry
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 15:41:17 -0700
)
Campimetry
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:57:44 -0700
)
Re: Sunglasses
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:46:10 GMT
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:32:18 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:18:23 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:06:58 GMT
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:05:10 GMT
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:05:48 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:02:58 GMT
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:02:40 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:01:17 GMT
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:00:22 GMT
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:56:23 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:55:19 -0700
)
Re: Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:42:30 -0700
)
Posting MY NAME all over the net.
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:38:32 -0700
)
Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:20:50 GMT
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:07:10 GMT
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:47:08 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:44:14 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:31:52 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:31:10 +1000
)
Re: Double Vision
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:00:54 -0000
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:38:10 -0700
)
Otis? Yet another failure?? No answer from you???
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:11:29 GMT
)
Re: Dizzy imbalanced feeling
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:07:59 -0700
)
Re: 1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Sat, 04 Aug 2007 01:57:18 GMT
)
Re: Fraudulent Intent
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:29:58 -0700
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:21:11 -0700
)
Re: Fraudulent Intent
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:27:01 -0700
)
Re: Fraudulent Intent
(3 Aug 2007 22:12:25 GMT
)
Re: Fraudulent Intent
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:40:01 -0700
)
[Myopiafree2] A clear statement of the majority-opinion.
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 03:01:50 -0000
)
Contact lens "Actual Price" comparison
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:39:50 -0700
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:02:15 GMT
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:43:00 -0700
)
Re: 1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:36:23 -0500
)
Re: 1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:25:40 -0500
)
Re: Dizzy imbalanced feeling
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:54:05 -0700
)
Neil Brooks credibility.
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:01:28 -0700
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:24:30 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:59:41 GMT
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 07:36:10 -0700
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:23:45 -0000
)
Re: Double Vision
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:56:05 -0700
)
Re: Double Vision
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:28:34 -0700
)
Re: 1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Fri, 3 Aug 2007 07:33:51 -0400
)
Re: 1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:21:22 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:54:36 -0700
)
Double Vision
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:48:09 -0000
)
Sunglasses
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:23:24 -0700
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:06:02 -0400
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:57:07 -0000
)
Re: New Rx
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:55:38 -0400
)
Re: 1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:28:36 -0400
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:03:43 -0400
)
Re: Glaucoma drop comparison?
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:31:37 GMT
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:04:37 -0000
)
Glaucoma drop comparison?
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:50:27 -0700
)
Re: New Rx
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:41:45 -0500
)
1.74 high index lenses vs. 1.67
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:13:25 -0700
)
Re: Dizzy imbalanced feeling
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:29:18 -0700
)
Cletis adjusts any sense of reality.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:20:55 -0700
)
Is There a point Cletis?
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:12:51 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:50:55 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:45:31 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:15:11 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:17:42 -0700
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:24:28 -0700
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:52:58 -0500
)
Re: Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:30:32 -0700
)
Neil Brooks invents delayed adjustable sutures.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:12:06 -0700
)
Re: Ad hominem in stereo
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:34:52 -0700
)
Re: Ad hominem in stereo
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:56:00 -0700
)
Re: Eye rectification sugery
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:44:16 -0700
)
Re: Ad hominem in stereo
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:42:13 -0700
)
Re: Ad hominem in stereo
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:27:02 -0500
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:24:51 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:03:38 -0700
)
Re: Was ad hominem, now news servers
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:55:57 -0700
)
Eye rectification sugery
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:49:01 -0000
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:44:37 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:17:12 -0700
)
Re: Ad hominem in stereo
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:02:49 -0700
)
Re: Ad hominem in stereo
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:19:27 -0500
)
Re: Another useless ad hominem
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:18:04 -0500
)
Re: Was ad hominem, now news servers
(Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:16:06 -0500
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:08:01 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:06:11 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:57:16 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:59:03 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:49:29 -0700
)
Re: Presbiopia contacts need advice !
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:02:52 GMT
)
Re: Presbiopia contacts need advice !
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 06:51:42 GMT
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:14:41 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:43:07 GMT
)
Re: Presbiopia contacts need advice !
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:32:25 -0000
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:08:45 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:59:46 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:48:04 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:29:42 -0000
)
Re: New Rx
(Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:50:17 -0400
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:27:56 -0400
)
Re: Dizzy imbalanced feeling
(Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:47:23 -0500
)
Re: Presbiopia contacts need advice !
(Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:44:46 -0500
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:44:47 -0700
)
Re: Glasses Prescriptions
(Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:25:25 -0500
)
Re: Dizzy imbalanced feeling
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:19:30 -0700
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:32:26 -0000
)
Dizzy imbalanced feeling
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:16:18 -0700
)
Presbiopia contacts need advice !
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:21:59 GMT
)
Re: Glasses Prescriptions
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:07:33 GMT
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:47:36 -0500
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:24:44 -0700
)
Re: Prescription Advice
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:54:54 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:01:01 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:44:50 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:36:59 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:03:04 GMT
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:40:24 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:38:21 GMT
)
Re: New Rx
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:21:06 -0600
)
Are you going to fill the prescription.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 07:16:09 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:15:34 -0000
)
A Clarification of Neil Brooks providing MEDICAL
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 07:01:07 -0700
)
Re: Glasses Prescriptions
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:20:55 -0000
)
Re: Glasses Prescriptions
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:15:51 -0600
)
Re: Glasses Prescriptions
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:56:46 -0700
)
Glasses Prescriptions
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:47:33 -0000
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:48:32 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:37:01 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:32:55 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:30:38 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:12:51 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:05:41 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:32:18 -0700
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 06:33:17 -0000
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:41:35 -0000
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:52:17 -0000
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:22:43 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:22:00 GMT
)
Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:16:24 -0000
)
Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:03:54 -0700
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:19:29 -0400
)
Re: New Rx
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:15:14 -0400
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:41:08 -0000
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:23:52 -0000
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:46:45 -0700
)
Re: Prescription Advice
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:39:02 -0700
)
Re: New Rx
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:17:56 -0500
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:00:20 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:55:48 -0700
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:00:32 -0500
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:04:46 -0700
)
Posting under an assumed name.
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:41:43 -0700
)
med
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:45:42 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:41:32 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:34:17 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:04:56 GMT
)
The remarkable similarity in apperance of David B. Granet
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:24:48 -0700
)
Re: follow up of posting 20/60 with -11.50 retinoscope/and other daughter
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:49:18 GMT
)
Re: follow up of posting 20/60 with -11.50 retinoscope/and other daughter
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:41:22 -0700
)
follow up of posting 20/60 with -11.50 retinoscope/and other daughter
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:40:53 GMT
)
Re: help a man who is really good
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:42:27 -0500
)
Welcome to sci.med.vision (7/30)
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:26:13 -0700
)
Re: New Rx
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:23:35 -0000
)
Re: Neil Brooks, DNA Match for David Granet?
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:30:08 -0700
)
Re: Neil Brooks, DNA Match for David Granet?
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:18:35 GMT
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:40:58 -0000
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:08:29 -0700
)
Re: New Rx
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:46:41 -0500
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:27:20 -0500
)
Re: Neil Brooks, DNA Match for David Granet?
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:13:40 -0700
)
Re: Prescription Advice
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:10:42 -0700
)
Re: new to progressives - not happy
(30 Jul 2007 23:10:27 GMT
)
Re: new to progressives - not happy
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:34:28 GMT
)
Re: Health is wealth
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:07:06 GMT
)
Health is wealth
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:17:06 -0700
)
Re: new to progressives - not happy
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:20:33 GMT
)
Prescription Advice
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:07:10 GMT
)
Re: Neil Brooks, DNA Match for David Granet?
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:18:51 -0700
)
Re: Neil Brooks, DNA Match for David Granet?
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:55:39 GMT
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:17:21 -0000
)
Is David Granet related to his
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:02:16 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:27:15 -0700
)
Re: Can I dilute Lotemax to make Alrex?
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:16:39 GMT
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:13:36 GMT
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:12:39 GMT
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:54:11 -0700
)
The reason Alex set up i-see.
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:32:29 -0700
)
Re: New Rx
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:09:31 -0000
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail.
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:49:52 -0000
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:44:09 -0400
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:37:33 -0400
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:29:39 -0000
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:48:23 GMT
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail.
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:53:15 -0700
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:49:10 GMT
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:46:04 -0400
)
Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:23:44 -0700
)
Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:32:29 GMT
)
Re: help a man who is really good
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 07:41:33 GMT
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 07:36:33 GMT
)
Re: help a man who is really good
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:53:12 -0000
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail.
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:33:28 -0700
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail.
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:28:34 -0700
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:23:33 -0400
)
Re: New Rx
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:05:45 -0000
)
help a man who is really good
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:00:08 -0000
)
Re: Contact lens design
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:21:11 -0000
)
About Richard.
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:57:23 -0700
)
Re: Contact lens design
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:35:15 -0700
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:34:26 -0000
)
Re: New Rx
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:01:39 -0000
)
Re: Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:19:17 GMT
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail. BTDT!
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:08:46 -0000
)
Re: Contact lens design
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:34:29 -0700
)
Re: Contact lens design
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:20:06 -0700
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail. BTDT!
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:11:26 -0000
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail. BTDT!
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:45:21 -0700
)
Re: New Rx
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:14:41 -0000
)
Re: New Rx
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:13:09 -0700
)
Re: New Rx
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:58:23 -0000
)
Does AR Coating Improve Vision?
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:56:09 -0000
)
Re: New Rx
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:41:43 -0000
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail.
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:43:53 -0700
)
Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail.
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:25:39 -0000
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:11:35 GMT
)
Why the bi-focal (plus) studies PRESUMABLY fail.
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:21:28 -0700
)
Re: Remarks Posted at Retinula's Request.
(Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:56:10 -0000
)
Re: Dry Eye Restasis and Opcon A
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:39:51 -0400
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:19:57 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:48:22 -0500
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:53:05 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:34:45 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:48:29 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:42:39 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:35:42 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:32:01 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:27:02 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:09:32 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:09:17 -0000
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:01:04 -0700
)
Re: Remarks Posted at Retinula's Request.
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:48:07 -0000
)
Further validation of my now-famous questions
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:36:20 GMT
)
Re: Remarks Posted at Retinula's Request.
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:36:33 -0500
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:33:42 -0500
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:19:54 -0700
)
Re: Posterior Vitreous Detachment "prevention"?
(Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:17:01 -0700
)
Sitemap sci.med.vision
#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29,